Tuesday, July 29, 2008

CTASC 2

The Counter Terrorism and Security Council, that group of 'only ones' who inflict us with civil rights violations, has done it again. Under the continued guise of 'security', they have ruled so that metal detectors, bag scans and searches by 'security' people (who look like they got their badges from a crackerjack box) are now in place at the Indiana Government Center, adjacent to the Statehouse. Oh yes. There is also at least one State Trooper observing the shenanigans at both stations.

This is 'phase 2' of a continuing 'security upgrade' which these guardians of safety claim make us safer. There is of course no actual basis for this. As I explained in the March 28, 2008 CTASC entry (http://whatmcauliffesaid.blogspot.com/2008/03/ctasc.html), and the June 9, 2007 entry Friday Meeting 3/30(http://whatmcauliffesaid.blogspot.com/2007/06/friday-meeting-330.html), their reasons are obvious and they had no intention of changing their minds. No carry at the Statehouse was instituted as a fiat rule with no adequate input by the people.

They refer to this as further 'improvements'. Talk about doublespeak! Improvements for violation of civil rights and more tyranny, yes. According to Brian Renner, Deputy Commissioner for the Department of Administration (pompous ass title for something that needs to be disbanded), 'most' fed and state gov buildings have instituted similar programs. He said this is typical. Not so. Most places are actually still 'free'. It depends on the level of statism inflicting said gov. buildings.

There have been no major threats. I remember a bomb scare during the original implimentation of the no firearms rule. Not swept away by 'conspiracy theories', it is interesting that it happened and at that time. It was handled without any of the CTASC measures. Someone tried a stunt a year ago in Denver. A nutcake tried to shoot the Colorado Governor in that Statehouse. He was shot and killed by a State cop. If it were here, it could have been a Trooper, State Rep or Senator, or me or other decent honest Hoosiers (or someone from out of state since we, at least, recognize all other permits and right to carry). How often does this stuff happen? Rarely. How is it handled? Quite well.

This whole thing comes down to trust. These only ones do not trust us armed. It has nothing to do with security. It has everything to do with control.

Some have said it's not practical to pursue this. Even Governor Daniels said this no carry isn't a big deal. Like Hell it isn't. Where can this kind of fiat rule end? Where will 'reasonable' restrictions stop? It's more than an imposition, it's an insult to all of us who choose to carry.

A fascinating point. That bomb threat involving the Statehouse was used to smooth the installation of the detectors etc. It occurred when the plans were being implemented and the first installation was due the followong June. The story had been updated March 19 or 2 1/2 months before installation. "I'm not really sure we'll go to metal detectors, but there will more of a checking of individuals," said State Senator Tom Wyss (R - District 15). Thus spake Wyss, who votes for anything that obstructs individual rights. He lied. Apparently, CTASC didn't think most citizens knew what they were up to. The only alert to the public was a posting in the want ads of the local paper of a chance for people to give their input. This was months before the incident. No one responded. Gee, I wonder why? I found out because I cared to see what was going on re gun rights. Though this obscure posting is 'legal', I have been exposing it and pushing for reform aka giving true fair notice and opportunity for several hearings/meetings concerning any of our rights.

Supposedly, this was all delayed because of legislative concern. Nope. Fear of exposure and actually legislative apathy were the cause. Our Lt. Gov. said there were suspicious late night visits to the Statehouse and property thefts involved, so we need to fill in security gaps and keep the building safe. Puhleeeze! Late night visits? Hmmm. Could be kinky assignations going on. Or, I happen to know a couple of legislators who actually work at the Statehouse. And property theft? Most likely employee theft. But whatever the cause, it's for our own good. So we should shut up and take our medicine. NO, NO, NO!

"We have to realize and appreciate the fact that it is the focal point of a lot of decisions that are made here that aren't always popular with everyone," said Paul Whitesell, Indiana State Police Superintendent. So says the State bulldog. That ought to settle it huh? Like hell it will.

I intend to continue reminding these 'public servants' just who they should be serving and why. It's my and your duty to warn them. So it is in a Constitutional Republic.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Renner looks like Mr. Ratburn from the Arthur cartoon on PBS. Quite the rat's nest.....

Anonymous said...

People will allow themselves to be disarmed, little by little.

Anonymous said...

Wyss lied. Big surprise huh? Don't they all?

Anonymous said...

What's sad, nay a p****r, is that most legs and the Secretary of State did little to stop it. What would they do if it was decided to come for the guns? Would they vote yey or nay? Would they risk their precious prestige and stand for Freedom?

The time to separtate the sheep from the goats is coming fast.

Anonymous said...

Late night visits to the Statehouse. Tippytoeing and shhhhhhh. Dat's funny right dar. No matter who you are dat's funny.

Anonymous said...

One thing is certain from my experiences there. The CTASC people and Homeland Security don't like me poking my nose where it actually belongs.

Anonymous said...

Hmmm. And if they don't like you asking and watching what gov does, what are they up to?

Anonymous said...

The good old boy who runs a gun rights group in Indiana did nothing to stop this. He discouraged doing anything to stop it in fact.

Now he is suggesting people get more 'involved'.

Mishawaka IN wants to ban guns on city property like South Bend tried.

Said good old boy spearheaded an effort to stop South Bend. Apparently it worked.
Now he 'suggests' people up north to take the ball.

There have been folks questioning him and intimating he wants to take credit for everythin 2A in Indiana.

I suspect this 'take the ball' touch is to take off heat from that accusation.

Good idea of course. That many have tried and some have (from his view) 'stolen his thunder'.

Anonymous said...

Where's 'Can the Ban'?

Anonymous said...

It's still in development. I want to contact as many gunowners in Indiana as possible. I kinda hope antis think I've given up. Not so.

I kave been as some know 'trying to turn words into money' aka my writing.

Money helps, but I'm going about that quietly re Can the Ban and my career. Two separate things and yet I hope my work eventually stands for Freedom.

Hope we get Can the Ban going while Mitch is Gov. It would be more uphill with Thompson. But I will just do it anyway.

Anonymous said...

Hey, first anon. Some will give em up and some will NOT -s-.

Anonymous said...

Spoke too soon re the 'good old boy'. He's whipping a frenzy to stop Mishawaka's Mayor and City Council from baqnning guns on city property. The State Rep up there called him twice to help. Good God, are there any people who have initiative besides him? Yes. I guess he couldn't resist leading the fight once again with his precious apparently private list of members.

Do I mind this? Yes and no. Yes cuz he restricts it and expect it to revolve round him. No cuz at least some are responding.

Anonymous said...

Fear not 'don't'. What I'm organizing and planning is inclusive and certainly NOT centered on one person or group.