Blunt Or Sharp

Can't help but remember the old 3 Stooges short where the Boys are given the choice of execution.  Burning at the stake or chop off their heads?

Curly immediately says the stake.  When Moe asks why, Curly says 'a hot stake is better than a cold chop'.  It is a nyukable moment but in reality neither is acceptable.

Civilization faces a similar fate.  The forces of jihad are ravaging portions of the world, even more than in the last 1400 years.  Paranoia?  Not if they're really after you.  Look around.

Now you might look at the surface.  Say it's just the rise of fanatics (sic).  You see the increasing carnage, destruction, mayhem of body and mind. But wouldn't you wonder why much of it is overlooked, excused, sometimes sanctioned?  Maybe I should have called this cahoots.

The left and jihad (sic) have often joined forces.  Hitler and mufti.  The current trend to let in socalled refugees and stand down to the increasing violence.  Why?  What gain do those from Western civilization gain?  Clue:  It's not Western civilization.  It is its hoped for destruction.

That was the goal in WW2 as it is now.  Destabilization.  Subversion.

The jihadists are both a diversion and cause/effect.

They are either a blunt instrument or a spearhead to bring about control.

Collectivists never change.  That crisis thing eh?

One side cons the other.  Both think they achieve victory and will do away with the other. 

The only thing standing in the way is a Republic.  And the desire to be free round the world.

We mustn't tut tut and just report atrocities.  We must shine the light and stop them.

Blunt or sharp?