Balance And More

I was reading A Fortunate Life, Robert Vaughn's autobiography.

A Liberal Democrat (!) got me to thinking about assassinations and the several reasons for them.

According to Vaughn's sources, Aristotle Onassis financed RFKs murder.

He has some plausible evidence, but I leave it to you all to read the bio.

I agree that Sirhan was a dupe, and further that he seemed to be suffering from some kind of mind control/hypnosis. Read for yourself and decide or call me crazy -s-.

The whole investigation afterwards was sloppy and full of holes. It was worse than JFKs followup.

Ari hated RFK, btw, since Kennedy's service on McCarthy's staff and investigation into some shady deals involving Commie Chinese and Arab interests that Ari was manipulating.

Onassis appeared to insinuate himself into Jackie Ks life, even before the death of the President. He took advantage of the fact that Jack and Jackie were falling out.

Aside from all of this, it gave way to thoughts of how and why people are killed.

To my mind, JFK, King and RFK, whatever you think of them, were stirring things up. They were uniting many people and causing some schisms.

Particularly, if Jack Kennedy were alive today, he might be considered the most conservative Democrat next to my Great Grandmother -s-.

Perhaps it's all beside the point now.

I don't think so, but to chase too many conspiracies is like a pup chasing its tail.

It distracts and keeps people from focussing on the results.

Gov crackdowns economically and politically after the death of those three guys in the 60s, not to mention the 68 GCA.

The Patriot Act and all the other idiot restrictions that are clamping the fist of tyranny tighter around us as a result of 911.

There can be many initial interests in the deaths of certain people. Some are personal like Onassis and RFK. Some are political in order to advance others to the 'throne' or to plant a new ideology. Some are business to establish eco control.

As for details as well as players, they are just as variegated as they can be. And if not, it just adss tot he tail chasing.

Dr. No's comment to James Bond about East and West being points of the compass and both stupid is quite apt. Differences? Sure. But they are used as pawns so that some kind of power play is advanced.

Liberal and conservative likewise are just labels used to mask the same goals for control.

I call this outing Balance And More because Freedom is being destroyed for all.

But the approach to Freedom is not in the equation. It's equivocated by those who are 'practical', 'pragmatic'.

Most people want certain things that are the same.

They want security and care about their children and the future.

Of course, it's the approach that differs.

The only approach that works is the course that the Founders took.

It must be brought back and with more.

We must remember 'they are put to get us all', ie, the Freedoms we hold so dear are being pi$$ed away.

We have only one way to bring them back.

Confrontation.

And the more?

That's what the Second Amendment is all about.